Please see http://wiki.dreamhost.com/index.php/Special:Search?search=access+mail+folders+server+inbox&fulltext=Search
for how to read mail in folders other than your inbox.
This includes:
- 1 messages that were more than 45 days old
You can configure how messages are rotated out of your inbox from your
mailboxes management area, at http://mailboxes.YOURDOMAIN.COM/ (replace
YOURDOMAIN.COM with your actual email address domain!)
If you utilize POP, and you’re receiving this message, you are likely
leaving your messages on the server. To help reduce the performance
impact this has on your server (and to stop receiving these pesky
notifications!) please read through the following articles on configuring
your email client:
Should I leave messages on the server?
http://wiki.dreamhost.com/index.php/Special:Search?search=leave+messages&fulltext=Search
(the reasons why you should configure you POP client intelligently)
Improving Mail Performance for Everyone!
http://wiki.dreamhost.com/index.php/Special:Search?search=improving+mail+performance&fulltext=Search
(basically, how to configure your POP client intelligently)
Your email folders can also be accessed via IMAP (or IMAP with SSL encryption,
the recommended approach) using the same username and password used to POP
your mail. If you have a shell user on your hosting account, pine is also
pre-configured to access your mail via IMAP.
Happy DreamHost Mail Team!
]]>Not simply linking to other posts or copying, but including the discourse that one would have in the comments on your own posts tends to make a good read for me. While it’s possibly true that this is due to the dirth of this type of post, i’d still love to see more posts like this.
My favourite portion is the question and response to “Why is the sky blue?” Similar to the “Airborne” disclosure, it was good to reveal his supposed b/sing on physics, and then to link and post to various discussions that had more info. How it’s different than Airborne, is by showing a weakness, and using for more than just the trickster’s distraction.
Update 1:: following the links and reading up more, two things happened. Plover posted some awesomeness there, http://blog.plover.com/physics/potassium.html, as he breaks down the radioactive decay energy generated from the K contained in a bag of rock salt over an hour. Mostly, he hands over a nice platter of awesome and insightful post.
The trickster’s distraction rears it’s ugly head once more, but going the other way this time : )
]]>highlights were:
“
“that’s…. highly improbable.”
not to mention that the duo had a great rapport, and were really quite hilarious. they said they were a little nervous presenting to us, but they shouldn’t have been. the work was fantastic, and absolutely hilarious. i do wish that we were a bit less daunting of a group, but i guess that’s hard to do. shouldn’t be, though.
i’d see them again, anytime. a really inspirational experience.
on a side note, there was a bit of competition between the two that was pretty funny, too. they seemed very comfortable with each other, which bespoke of good history and shared experiences. some people wondered out loud why they seemed to step on each others toes. i didn’t really notice it much, and felt like they had a good symbiotic conversation style.
]]>i has a fascination with it, and i has a karot that i happily offer to those with informations.
]]>of late, i’m having a harder time believing in it. i guess i’m having a harder time believing in permanence.
here’s tom with the weather…
]]>In terms of development efforts, it’s better to schedule anything you want by January 1 for December 1. Because otherwise, you’re just going to slide on past it.
So, i propose that December be stricken from the record, and we all go to Vegas for the month.
]]>what do i think people want to see from a short by an unsigned nobody? i think they, or you, want to be surprised by something clever. you don’t want smiles at the end. you want bling, but with a point. story story story.
i saw pete jackson one day last year, and i thought afterwards what question i’d ask him. i thought it’d be,
“does this ordering sound right?
1. plot 2. edit 3. camerawork 4. location 5. acting 6. effects”